Justia Lawyer Rating
10 Best, Attorney Client Satisfaction Badge from the American Institute of Criminal Law Attorneys
Top 100 Trial Lawyers Badge from The National Trial Lawyers
Top 100 Badge from America's Top 100 Criminal Defense Attorneys
Avvo Rating, 10.0 Scott Grabel
Top 10, Attorney and Practice Magazine's, Criminal Defense Law Firm

Title I. Applicability of Rules

Title 28 App. Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure

Title I. Applicability of Rules

  • Rule 1. Scope of Rules; Title
  • Rule 2. Suspension of Rules

Rule 1. Scope of Rules; Title

  1. Scope of Rules.
    1. These rules govern procedure in the United States courts of appeals.
    2. When these rules provide for filing a motion or other document in the district court, the procedure must comply with the practice of the district court.
  2. [Abrogated.]
  3. Title. These rules are to be known as the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Rule 2. Suspension of Rules

On its own or a party’s motion, a court of appeals may—to expedite its decision or for other good cause—suspend any provision of these rules in a particular case and order proceedings as it directs, except as otherwise provided in Rule 26 (b).

Federal Appeals Lawyer

Defendants who have been convicted of a federal criminal crime are entitled to file a direct appeal under federal statute 18 U.S.C. §§ 3732, 3742. The defendant may appeal either the conviction or the sentence imposed after either a guilty plea has been entered, or after a trial. A defendant’s conviction is not final until it has been affirmed on direct appeal.

Defendants who file an appeal are known as the “appellate.” An appeal is sent to a court of appeals in which the trial court proceedings are reviewed to make sure that all proceedings were carried out in accordance with the law.

Your lawyer may not introduce new evidence in an appeal and an appeal is not a request for a new trial — it is a request for a review of the proceedings that led to a conviction or served as the basis for sentencing.

The appellate court takes into consideration the merits for the appeal and compares that information to existing court records including:

  • Records of the trial court proceedings; and
  • Court reporter’s transcripts which are the verbatim transcript of oral proceedings.

The appellant does not have to appear in court; most of a criminal appeal is handled in writing by the filing attorney, who may also appear in court to argue the appeal, but this is not always the case. Many appeals are decided strictly on the basis of what your attorney files, and the subsequent review by the court of appeals.


As laws are dynamic and subject to change, this website may not always reflect recent changes. We refer you to The United States Congress website, which may have more current or accurate information. To discuss your appeal, or how appellate laws may apply in your case, contact our law offices to schedule a free consultation.

Client Reviews

Scott Grabel was kind enough to look into my situation and take his time to speak with me free of charge. Most attorneys will not do that. He gave me reassurance that I had nothing to worry about. If I am ever in need of an attorney in the future I will be calling Scott Grabel and will highly recommend him to anyone with a legal issue. G. K.
Great job Tim, Scott, Daniel very aggressive and knowledgeable They always call you back if you have questions even after hours the best outcome I could've hoped for thanks again R. E.
Great lawyer he went into court and ripped the girl trying to lie on me a new one. He fot me off on all charges and with out him i would be in prision. Thank you so much i will definitely keep your number and pass it on to any one in trouble and keep it for future incase i ever have to go back to court K. J.